GoldenEye [Hindi] (1995) - Dubbed Other movies recommended for you
GoldenEye [Hindi](in Dubbed Hollywood Movies) GoldenEye [Hindi] (1995) - Download Movie for mobile in best quality 3gp and mp4 format. Also stream GoldenEye [Hindi] on your mobile, tablets and ipads
Plot: When a deadly satellite weapon system falls into the wrong hands, only Agent James Bond 007 (Pierce Brosnan) can save the world from certain disaster. Armed with his licence to kill, Bond races to Russia in search of the stolen access codes for "GoldenEye", an awesome space weapon that can fire a… Runtime: 130 min Release Date: 24 Nov 1995
This one deserves much more credit then it has received. (by Pietka-2)
This is by far one of the best Bond films simply because it does not try to be a Bond film. GoldenEye demonstrates an impressive independence that separates it from the tried-and-true-but-getting-boring Bond formula. The one liners are not that great, but the action sequences are mindblowing. The chase scene is the best I have ever seen in any movie. Period. Purists will complain that there is a lack of gadgetry, but let them pout and go back to MacGyver reruns. Possibility is not permissibility. Just because Bond has a snazzy car does not mean that he has to utilize every perk that Q has <more>
included. It is a relief that the writers did not force a new scene just to show off the car. The movie does not need one, which helps it to maintain its quality as not just a Bond movie, but a high quality action movie that can stand on its own. You will even find gasp! . . . character building! There is actually dialogue between Q and Bond, instead of just a briefing and some commands. Brosnan more than holds his own against past Bonds, and offers some of that GQ gentlemen element found missing in some of the past ones. Bond fan, action fan, any fan, check this one out. I even made my girlfriend watch it, and even she enjoyed it. Chances are you will too.
After a 6 year hiatus the producers needed to make this film good enough to bring Bond back to the forefront, and in comparison to the films that followed, I believe this to be the best. Without a cold war to fuel plot lines, the story is able to step into new territories, with many great plot elements. Pierce Brosnan portrays Bond amazingly well in my opinion, and ties all the classic 007 elements together flawlessly. Although adhering to the Bond foundations, this film has a great, fresh feel to it, I think partly due to the industrial style score by Eric Serra. I think you need to see this <more>
film more than once to fully appreciate it, but it is definitely a classic!
*** 1/2Starring: Pierce Brosnan, Izabella Scorupco, Sean Bean, and Famke Janssen.Double-0 agent James Bond, still as suave and sophisticated as he was in the last film, enters Russia in search of the stolen Goldeneye satellite. After six years without 007, the fans needed a movie like this. Just about everything in this works, from the witty plot to Pierce Brosnan as the new Bond. And I can't review this without complimenting Sean Bean as the series best villain.Rank in the Series: 1st
Brosnan helps resurrect Bond in an "A" effort (by TimBoHannon)
Much had changed for James Bond since Sean Connery first took the role in 1962. The series had taken a turn for the worse in the seventies, when five films were made but zero good ones were. Still, the public was willing to grant Bond limitless amnesty that decade, even as his escapades grew less and less exciting and more and more campy with each new film. The 70s came and went, ushering in the 80s, which kicked off well with 1981's "For Your Eyes Only." However, it went all downhill from there as the public finally stopped tolerating the bad movies and his popularity tanked in <more>
favor of superior competition. Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger became mega stars during that time, and the emergence Indiana Jones was making Bond look dull and decrepit by comparison. Tim Burton's summer sweep of the cinemas with "Batman" in 1989 exacerbated Bond's woes, and when legal disputes arose between the production company and the studio shortly thereafter, it appeared that Bond had finally died his horrible but well deserved death.When the legal issues were finally put to rest in 1994, it was announced that another Bond film was going to be made, but not with erstwhile incumbent Timothy Dalton. Pierce Brosnan was given the role after being forced to reject it in the late eighties, and production began. The success of the film was crucial. If it lacked spark or came across as campy, it was likely that Bond would be finished forever. With the stakes in mind, the Broccoli family the Bond producers hired an all-new creative team and set to work re-establishing 007 in a new era.I knew none of that when I first saw the film in 1999. It was my introduction to the world of James Bond, and was a truly an exceptional first handshake. Knowing what I know now, and seeing the Bond films I have seen now, I still find it as worthwhile as I did then, and I am forever thankful that it was made well enough to not only resuscitate Bond, but propel him into the nineties with the momentum of a blazing fastball.The film opens in the eighties, ironically, with a scene depicting the Bond and Agent 006, real name Alec Trevelyan, being detected inside a Soviet chemical weapons factory. This section also introduces the character of Ourumov Gottfried John , who murders Alec seemingly on a whim.Nine years later, Bond meets an appealing young lady Famke Janssen while driving...make that playfully racing, near Monte Carlo. Suspicious, he follows her to a nearby casino where he finds out that her name is Xenia Onatopp and she carries ties to the Janus crime syndicate in St. Petersburg. He chases Xenia when he suspects an imminent crime, but is not in time to avert her theft of the Tiger--a helicopter that is hardened to all forms of electronic interference.Back at MI-6 headquarters, the Tiger is spotted via satellite at Russian satellite control facility, and it soon becomes obvious that the copter is merely part of a grander scheme to steal a scary satellite weapon called GoldenEye. What it does can be described with words, but not with as much clarity as seeing it in the movie there are lapses in the visuals here, but the sight is so impressive that they hardly matter . Bond then departs for St. Petersburg to find the Janus head man Sean Bean and stop him from using GoldenEye on a more vulnerable target. Much mystery surrounds the identity of Janus, but it is in the trailer and I suspect most people know it by now.There are several reasons that "GoldenEye" is the best Bond film made in many, many years. The first is the tone, which has ushered out all of the giddy goofiness of Roger Moore's films and assumed one reminiscent of the earliest Bond films. The sets, the camera work and the dialogue all come across as subtle, subconscious reminders of why Bond became so beloved to begin with.I always felt there were two major problems with the Bonds of the seventies and eighties. The first is the inane tone exception: "For Your Eyes Only," , a point I am driving into the ground. With the same exception, they also featured uniformly unexciting read it: bad action plus horrendous acting. There are light moments in "GoldenEye," as there should be, but the correct tone is never compromised. The only problem is that there is a little too much padding in the middle. The story is well told, although there is a meeting with Bond and Valentin Zukovsky reprised by Robbie Coltrane in "The World is Not Enough" that has no significance to the advancement of the story. It is unnecessary and causes the film to drag some. After Bond meets Janus, though, prepare for the film to take off, as there will be little rest from there on out.Just like in the early Bonds, the acting transcends the genre. Pierce Brosnan is the clear focal point, and is mostly successful. He seems too reserved at times, as if he is a little timid at acting his best for fear it might look bad. He does not lack charm, though, because there is something about Pierce that makes him the ultimate ladies man on screen and off. More successful is Sean Bean as James's opponent. Bean brings cold, subtle intensity to the role that shows off the acting skills that got him cast in "The Fellowship of the Ring." General Ourumov, who is in bed with Janus, provides a second bad guy. Gottfried John portrays him as a demonstrative brute, and his style provides a fine foil to Bean's controlled anger. Alan Cumming plays an evil computer nerd who provides most the light moments I referred to earlier. Fellow X-Man Famke Janssen's character is downright demented, and will not be forgotten easily.My friends, I have just explained why "GoldenEye" is a most superior Bond film that brought Agent 007 back from the dead and won over a new generation of fans. The best way I can think of to conclude this review is to comment on the film's conclusion. At one point it involves a brawl between Bond and Janus who is referred to by his real name by that time that buries just about every other one in the series. While it does quite not take the gold from the fistfight that opens "Thunderball," is does serve as a final reminder that Bond is indeed back, and that he is once again a force best not ignored.
After coming of the failures of The Living Daylights and License to Kill, Bond bounces back with a new 007. James Bond Pierce Brosnan is sent to discover why a satellite station at Severnaya has been destroyed by a satellite named Goldeneye. Along his mission, Bond receives help from the joyful CIA agent Jack Wade and the beautiful Severnaya operative Natalya Simonova Izabella Scorupco . Throughout the movie Bond fights in a library and drives a tank through Moscow. The story for a Bond movie was solid and Goldeneye brought my favorite villain in Alec Trevelyan Sean Bean . Brosnan does a <more>
great job as the charming 007 and Izabella Scorupco as the Bond girl. Goldeneye comes along with lovable characters and hateful villains, amazing action sequences and a great hatred between Bond and Trevelyan.Goldeneye. Starring: Pierce Brosnan, Izabella Scorupco, Sean Bean, Gottfried John. 3 1/2 out of 5 Stars.
The last time we saw James Bond was 1989 with Timothy Dalton. Six years later 007 finally returned with another new face, the great Irishman Pierce Brosnan. Bond is out of the cold war and now lives in the real 20th century and faces today's world filled with terrorism, tanks, bombs and missiles. He faces the nasty and well played villain Sean Bean as Alec Travalian, the big twist that he used to be his partner, hence the name Janis. Travalian has stolen a weapon called the GoldenEye which was the name of Ian Fleming's house , capable of destructing a whole country. Bond later meets <more>
the gorgeous Natalya Fyodorovna Simonova Polish actress Izabella Scorupco who assists him in finding this weapon. Also starring Famke Janssen as Xenia Onatopp, Joe Don Baker as Jack Wade who returned in Tomorrow Never Dies , Robbie Coltrane as Valentin Zukovsky who returned in The World Is Not Enough , Alan Cumming as Boris Grishenko, Desmond Llewelyn as Q, Samantha Bond as the new Miss Moneypenny, Michael Kitchen as Bill Tanner and Dame Judi Dench as the new female M. Filled with marvellous stunts, the Aston Martin DB5, and very good action sequences this is a very good start for the new Bond. It was nominated the BAFTAs for Best Special Effects and Best Sound. James Bond was number 3 on 100 Years, 100 Heroes & Villains, he was number 21 on The 100 Greatest Sex Symbols, and he was number 21 on The 100 Greatest Pop Culture Icons, Dame Judi Dench was number 1 on The 50 Greatest British Actresses, she was number 1 on Britain's Finest Actresses, and she was number 8 on The World's Greatest Actor, and the film was number 11 on James Bond's Greatest Hits for Tina Turner's written by Bono and The Edge title song. Very good!
I can't help it - this is the best (by Rammstein-2)
Sorry y'all. I think this is the best James Bond ever. Not only because Pierce Brosnan IS James Bond, or because it feels modern having a woman and what a woman! cast as M. Or even the fact that this film actually is just a little bit believable...I love the feel of it. The part where JB races through ... Moscow, is it? I dunno ... with a tank is just superb.There is only one thing I dislike: why oh why did they have to put the BMW in the film? They don't use it!It's in the film for only a couple of minutes, not even that. Product Placement at its worst. And it's such an <more>
Campbell's "GoldenEye" embraces many of the best-loved motifs and situations from the classic Bond movies (by Nazi_Fighter_David)
Brosnan has the look, the style, the intelligence and the bravura that James Bond should have As charming, sophisticated, and always in control of the situation, Bond called upon all his ability for improvising escapes from truly impossible situations The new Bond drives a BMW, remains preferring his vodka martinis 'shaken but not stirred,' and uses a Walther PPK, 7.65mm The famous announcement "Bond, James Bond" is changed The plot line of "Goldeneye" revolves around an international terrorist organization calling itself Janus that steels a top-secret <more>
Russian weapon system named GoldenEye and threatens to use it to destroy a major European city unless paid off Bond's mission was to find and stop the GoldenEye, struggling with a sadistic assassin, a treacherous general, an 'invincible' computer hacker, and most dangerous of all, a colleague and friend The opening scene is spectacular with a great bungee jump from a top of a dam to an exciting racing over a cliff in a motorcycle and skydiving into a crushing private plane Martin Campbell's film comes with a phenomenal tank chase through the streets of St. Petersburg; a brutal showdown in the jungle; and a battle to the death on a high gantry Goldeneye's female characters are honestly beautiful with particular techniques The bad one is Xenia Onatopp Famke Janssen , an ex-Soviet fighter pilot who tranquilly smokes big cigars and knocks off her victims with her 'killer thighs.' In one scene, she challenges Bond's legendary Aston Martin DB5 to a wild road race outside Monte Carlo with her red Ferrari; in another she was so smart that she snatches a top-secret helicopter from under the noses of the French navy The good Bond girl is the irresistible Natalya Simonova Izabella Scorupco who 'tastes like strawberries.' Natalya possesses all the technical ability to neutralize Janus' scheme or to destroy all computer records with the GoldenEye As one who survived a mass murder, this lovely beauty is suddenly a marked woman The other supporting actors are all fine: Sean Bean plays a potentially fascinating bad character, the embittered and cynical traitor who was believed to have been killed on a mission Alec Trevelyan has sworn revenge on the country that was responsible for his parents' suicide Alan Cumming plays the 'invincible' Boris Grishenko who sees crime as a chance to show off his skills; and Gottfried John, the renegade ambitious general who provides inside access to Russian military secrets Award-winning Judi Dench is terrific as Bond's unshaken spy chief Samantha Bond as MoneyPenny puts forward for consideration that Bond's behavior might be interpreted as sexual harassment Serena Gordon as the neurotic MI6 assessor Caroline evaluates 007 for just 'trying to show off the size of his ego.' One familiar face among the MI6 staff was that of the redoubtable Q, played once again by Desmond Llewelyn who introduces 007 to his latest chariot, the BMW Z3 Although convertible, this agile vehicle doesn't play a significant action role in the film Q doesn't forget to deliver Bond a typical leather belt, a watch that expels a laser beam, and a silver pen used to clever effect The 17th Bond film takes us from Russia, Puerto Rico, Monaco and back to England It features one of the best title tunes performed by the "Queen of Rock & Roll," Tina Turner For trivia buffs: Kate Gayson appears as an extra at the Chemin De Fer table at Monte Carlo's gambling casino; she's the daughter of Eunice Gayson, who played Bond's fetching girlfriend, Sylvia Trench in the first two Bond films, "Dr. No" and "From Russia With Love." It was to Sylvia Trench that Sean Connery uttered his first line of dialog, "I admire your luck, Mr. ...?"
Excellent Bond film and Brosnan's best outing (by ametaphysicalshark)
Six years passed between the release of "Licence to Kill" and "GoldenEye", Pierce Brosnan's debut as Bond, and those six years were clearly beneficial to the franchise. "GoldenEye" has its fair share of flaws, but it feels revitalized and fresh, unlike the film it follows, "Licence to Kill", a lethargic offering that was deservedly the lowest grossing Bond film when adjusted for inflation. "GoldenEye" makes a clean break from previous franchise films, becoming self-aware for the first time and taking on an almost revisionist feel by <more>
casting Judi Dench as M and having her call Bond a 'sexist, misogynist dinosaur'. Even the Bond girls are in no way dependent on Bond- if you count the villain she was clearly the uh... 'dominant' half of that relationship, and even the 'good' girl bossed Bond around. In a way this is refreshing to see, and Brosnan fits the part excellently, never losing his composure, always with a witty one-liner to throw back. The main reason I like Brosnan a lot better than Moore is that he doesn't take the 'class' act too far. He's classy, charming, witty, but also cruel and ruthless when he needs to be. I don't see the validity of the claims that he was the wimpiest Bond; he's got far more physicality than Moore and a much harder edge, generally speaking. "GoldenEye" does have its flaws, of course. The film could have been a whole 20 minutes shorter, the musical score is not one of the best of the franchise but not nearly as bad as some suggest , and the humor, outside of Brosnan's one-liners, falls flat most of the time. I'm also not sure about the huge emphasis on technology, which is taken too far at times here, and would be taken even farther into the land of the completely ridiculous later in the series. Then again, it was the mid-90's and technology was a hot topic. The film handles its subject matter well for the most part. The film's action set-pieces are terrific and the sets look beautiful. One of the things that impressed me most about "GoldenEye" is that when it went for drama it succeeded reasonably well. Sean Bean and Famke Janssen make a terrific team of villains and Martin Campbell keeps the film moving at a swift pace, drastically improving on John Glen's work in "Licence to Kill"."GoldenEye" may not be the best Bond film, but it's a welcome addition to the series. Brosnan is not as good a Bond as Connery at his best, but he's on par with Lazenby and Dalton, if not better, and most certainly better than Roger Moore. 20 minutes shorter and "GoldenEye" could have been an absolute classic, but as it is it's an excellent Bond offering and one of the better Bond films. The title song is terrific, isn't it?8/10